The back story
Google's
YouTube video sharing serviceadded a closed-captions
feature last year in an effort to make videos more valuable.
A video with captions makes a lot more sense to a
hearing-impaired user, of course, but there are many other
reasons to support text in videos as well. And this week,
YouTube became better in many ways -- all thanks to obscure
Google projects that seem to have nothing to do with
videos.
I've heard that some people might watch YouTube videos at
work (but of course I wouldn't have any firsthand experience
of that). The
Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) iPhone can't play
YouTube's videos directly because they are presented in the
Flash format from
Adobe Systems (Nasdaq: ADBE), which the
iPhone can't handle -- but there's an app for getting around
that problem. I'd imagine that a student or two in a packed
college auditorium could sneak in a few YouTube videos in the
course of a long, boring lecture on economics or calculus. In
short, some people like to watch videos with the sound turned
off.
Other times, text just helps you understand better what
people are saying. I'll fully admit to watching TV on a daily
basis with the captions turned on, especially when faced with
odd accents or the kind of dialogue where every word counts.
And here's the kicker: When you convert spoken-word material
into text, suddenly you can make it searchable, quotable, and
translatable. And that makes better citizens in
Google-land.
The news
So Google is making it faster and easier to add
captions to a video by incorporating automatic transcription
into the process. It's the same speech-to-text algorithm
that's used by
Google Voiceto create transcripts of voice mails. In
turn, the whole shebang was originally trained with data from
the 1-800-GOOG-411 directory assistance service.
The auto-captioning service will start small, with a
handful of partners who specialize in lectures and
instruction videos, including Yale, UCLA, PBS, and official
channels of content produced by Google or YouTube staff. I
expect to see a wide rollout in coming months when a few bugs
and quirks have been worked out of the system. The idea is to
eventually have captions on every video that needs them, and
these auto-captioning tools simplify the process. As a
corollary, the act of processing and then error-checking this
first batch of videos should improve the quality of the
transcription algorithms, which will make GOOG-411 and the
voice mail features more useful as well.
The reasons why
And that is why Google keeps rolling out small,
specialized services that seem to make no sense: They add up
to a framework of tools that can be tied together into a
greater lattice of goodness. If you're a tech geek like me,
you might recognize this philosophy as a basic tenet of Unix
operating systems, where a handful of super-specialized tools
can be chained together in a script or command line to do
amazing things. Google is a master of
algorithm magiclike this in a way that Microsoft and
Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO) have never been able to
seriously challenge. That includes you,
Bing.
So Google hands out 411 information for free, which must
be a huge thorn in the sides of
AT&T (NYSE: T) and
Verizon (NYSE: VZ), among others. Does Google
make money from that service? No. But the information
gathered there improves several other services. Some of them
domake money -- and I believe that YouTube is one of
them by now -- so anything that draws people further into the
Google experience is good for Google's top and bottom
lines.
A happy Google user surfs the Web more. Increased surfing
means more ad clicks. And that's the real payoff. Google is
the biggest
Rule BreakerI've seen -- in more than just market
cap.
© 2009 UCLICK L.L.C.
Post new comment